GUARDIAN  |  Opinion

The Guardian view on Rachel Reeves’s spring statement: stability cannot mean sacrificing living standards

《卫报》对瑞秋·里夫斯春季声明的看法:稳定不能以牺牲生活水平为代价

Rachel Reeves delivers her spring budget statement. ‘If fiscal choices are to command public support, they must be seen to serve a social purpose, not just bond markets.’

Rachel Reeves delivers her spring budget statement. ‘If fiscal choices are to command public support, they must be seen to serve a social purpose, not just bond markets.’

2026-03-03  571  中等
字体

The OBR’s projected decline in borrowing relies on taxes climbing to a post-second world war high by 2030-31 and departmental spending shrinking as a share of GDP after 2027-28. That means real pressure on household budgets and public services unless growth outperforms expectations. Hardly a vote winner. It also means that if nothing is done to cushion the blow of sustained higher energy prices, economic growth will likely weaken or inflation will rise. Given the geopolitical turmoil, it’s hardly surprising that the OBR warns that defence spending will have to rise. Ms Reeves says fiscal credibility matters. But it will ring hollow if, as the Joseph Rowntree Foundation warns, real incomes fall between this April and 2029.

请登录后继续阅读完整文章

还没有账号?立即注册

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能,了解更多


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。