GUARDIAN  |  Opinion

The Guardian view on saving Westminster: parliament should leave London

《卫报》观点:拯救西敏寺:议会应该离开伦敦

‘The refurbishment of the palace could be an opportunity for Britain to begin a serious conversation about how to spread power to other parts of the UK.’

‘The refurbishment of the palace could be an opportunity for Britain to begin a serious conversation about how to spread power to other parts of the UK.’

2026-02-25  580  中等
字体

The question is no longer whether to act, but whether parliament dares to move. There are two choices the board proposes. Both chambers could move out of the palace for the main works, which could last two decades, at a cost, including inflation, of £16bn. The alternative is for the Lords to move out for up to 13 years, allowing the Commons to decant into the upper house. But that option would prolong the overall works programme to as much as 61 years and cost £40bn. Given those numbers, it is hard to see MPs choosing the latter.

请登录后继续阅读完整文章

还没有账号?立即注册

成为会员后您将享受无限制的阅读体验,并可使用更多功能,了解更多


免责声明:本文来自网络公开资料,仅供学习交流,其观点和倾向不代表本站立场。